The start of a new year is not only an opportunity to look forwards to what we want to achieve over the coming year, but also an opportunity to reflect on our achievements and how we have grown over the previous year.
In a discussion during supervision with one of my team this last week, they reflected on a particular interaction which for them had been a ‘game changer’ in terms of how they approach their work.
A few months ago, my colleague contacted me as they had recieved a ‘challenging’ email from a person that we were investigating. It was aggressive in tone and asked numerous questions about the investigation procedure – some of which we could answer but others were outside our knowledge or understanding.
We worked together to draft a response. My colleague had initially preferred a shorter response, to close the matter down. I talked about the importance of answering every question the ‘angry employee’ had asked, to make sure that we had attempted to address their concerns. If we did not have an answer, our role was to highlight who they could approach in order to get an answer. It took time to craft, but at the end I felt that we had demonstrated our fairness and transparency through our response.
The next email from the ‘angry employee’ was……..well not angry. They described how they appreciated our attempt to reassure them by providing the information that they had been seeking. From then on, all the correspondence between my colleague and this employee was professional and polite.
None of this should be a surprise. One of the ‘prongs’ of Organisational Justice is interactional justice - which relates to the fairness of the interactions between a supervisor and an employee when determining an outcome (Bies and Moag, 1986). This can either be on an interpersonal basis, which considers the respectful treatment of an employee (Niehoff and Moorman, 1993); or on an informational basis, where the fairness of the explanations given are considered (Colquitt, 2001; Greenberg, 1993).
By taking time to ensure that emails from others are answered in full, we’re not ‘shutting people down’ and denying them a voice. We’re demonstrating transparency and respect. Since then, my colleague has adopted this approach and has found that their relationships with others has tangibly improved – just by taking a bit more time to reflect and ensuring there is attention to detail in a response.
References:
Bies, R. J., and Moag, J. F. (1986) ‘Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness’. In Lewiciki, R.J., Sheppard, B.H. and Bazerman, M.H. (Eds.), “Research on Negotiation in Organization”, Vol 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 43-55.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). ‘On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure’. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86 pp.386-400.
Greenberg, J. (1993) ‘The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice’. In Cropanzano, R. (Ed.), “Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management”, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum pp.79-103.
Niehoff, B.P., Moorman, R.H. (1993), ‘Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviors’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36 (3) pp. 527-556.